This company supplies many restaurants around town and their name is always said with a sense of respect and awe (as in I should be in awe that this restaurant is carrying such fine meats). This is a family owned operation. It's all natural.
So I looked up the name and their main address for their operations is "Feedlot Lane". They do get cattle from smaller farm--as calves. The cows still spend most of their lives in a feedlot eating controlled diets and are humanely given
The feedlot provided 25,000 head of cattle with one foot of bunk space and 250 square feet of roaming space per calf. The company built a state-of-the-art veterinary center for animal healthcare, as well.Jim Sincock, on his local foods social site COLORADO SUSTAINABILITY touches on the undefined term "natural" especially opposed to "organic". But I pretty much knew that the beef was going to be grain-fed as some sort. I knew it would be fattier than grass-fed beef but you know I get tempted by the talk of "tender" and special breeds of cattle that are suppose to be better than prime with perfect marbling. Furthermore, it was a "family" operation--though no one seems to add that it's not a family ranch we're supporting but a family feedlot. I guess it would not be good for business if that was known.
So I get the ribeye and it's tender (in between all the fat) and it has so much sauce and other stuff on it that I can't really even taste the meat (I wonder why?) and it's just plain mushy. In the end it tasted just like every other steakhouse steak--like nothing special. I tell you I keep going to these acclaimed steakhouses quite by accident and I keep trying the steak and haven't been really impressed.
Maybe it's all in my head? Because I know it's not grass-fed? Would I be able to tell the difference? I don't know any more. But I know I'm less than impressed so far. Maybe it's the cooking style?
Anyway, upon finding that this operation is just another feedlot I have to wonder why more chefs aren't really looking for the good food? Is it all about money? Can affordable grass-fed options not be found? Are they afraid to go against lousy expectations? I don't know and I doubt if anyone in the know reads this. However, if I could get some answers from such, that would be cool. I'm always willing to hear things out and know where I may be wrong.
Don't even get me started on the appalling state of "all-natural" chicken or even worse "just" chicken that is nothing but sponge chicken.
There's a story in a Slow Food reader that talks about how some westerner tried to introduce factory raised chicken into Vietnam. So the story goes that the Vietnamese were quite happy eating their slow raised chickens, many of which just ran around freely in the neighborhoods. However, some of them were enticed to eat this new chicken from the stores. This cheaper chicken.
They were not impressed. They did not enjoy the unnatural tenderness lauded by the chicken producers. Seems that going directly from naturally (in the truest sense of the word) raised chicken to factory produced chicken in all its glory was too much of a jump for one generation.
This is in contrast to most westerners who have grown up eating debauched meats. Our palates were given a more gradual time across decades to adjust from flavor to non-tasting tenderness that we're all told should be the primary focus of our foods. The Vietnamese referred to this new chicken as "Yank chicken".
